Medical News TODAY attempts to save oncopatients-2010. Bad theories of cancer. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropinions.php?opinionid=38197.
Posted by Vadim I. Shapoval on 24 Aug 2010 at 4:08 am
Cancer researchers like to invent half-correct, unfinished and bad theories of cancer. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/135271.php#post
German scientist Otto H. Warburg’s theory on the origin of cancer earned him the Nobel Prize in 1931, but the biochemical basis for his theory remained elusive. His theory that cancer starts from irreversible injury to cellular respiration eventually fell out of favor amid research pointing to genomic mutations as the cause of uncontrolled cell growth.
Seventy-eight years after Warburg received science’s highest honor, researchers from Boston College and Washington University School of Medicine report new evidence in support of the original Warburg Theory of Cancer …http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1264937 The Theory of Cancer, by R.Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. What Causes Cancer. About one and a half years into my alternative cancer research I had already run into several instances where I heard about microbes being found inside of cancer cells. During this time I just shrugged it off. It was not that I didn’t believe it, but I couldn’t determine whether such microbes were a cause of cancer or just an opportunistic parasite inside a weakened cell … It was perfectly clear that “cancer microbes” were getting into normal cells and their presence was turning the normal cells into anaerobic cells (an anaerobic cell does not burn oxygen like a normal cell, rather it ferments glucose to get energy). The definition of an anaerobic cell is a “cancer cell.” A Nobel Prize was given in 1931 (Otto Heinrich Warburg) for the discovery that a cancer cell is anaerobic. I have seen several different descriiptions of this cancer microbe in the cancer cell. Some people called it a virus, some a fungus, one called it a mould, others called it an acid-fast bacteria (which mutated into a fungus) and one called it an amoeba (e.g. trichomonad). Which of these is correct? Probably all of them … Inside each cell are mitochondria. These mitochondria are where the energy of the cell is created, in the form of a molecule called ATP. The chemical process by which ATP are made start with what is called “The Krebs Cycle” or the “Citric Acid Cycle.” This cycle of chemical reactions leads to the creation of ATP … In a cancer cell, the Krebs Cycle is broken. Since the ETC is a spin-off of the Krebs Cycle, it is broken also. The result of breaking the Krebs Cycle is that the energy in the cell (i.e. the number of ATP molecules) drops dramatically. The human cell is a very sophisticated living thing. (!!!) When the Krebs Cycle is broken, the cell is generally able to fix the cycle, thus restoring the energy in the cell. But with a cancer cell, the cell is not able to restore its Krebs Cycle … I think cancer-Krebs of mind can attack some illiterate cancer researchers. http://www.tutuz.com/
Vadim I. Shapoval, author of the ferromagnetic theory of cancer (Iron Conception)
