A former New York Times contributor wonders if Weinstein sabotaged her 13 years ago


Harvey Weinstein. (Andrew Kelly/Reuters)

Harvey Weinstein’s attorney, David Boies, hired private investigators to try to kill a New York Times’s report on sexual-harassment allegations opposite Weinstein that a journal eventually published in October.


That’s only one of a extraordinary revelations in Ronan Farrow’s latest New Yorker piece, that chronicles a Hollywood titan’s elaborate bid to overpower accusers and reporters by dishonesty and intimidation. The try to stop a Times from edition final month’s essay by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey failed, obviously.

Less transparent is either a identical harm debate competence have successfully hindered a prior stating plan by a Times in 2004.

“Don’t know,” pronounced Sharon Waxman, a former Times contributor who followed sexual-harassment allegations opposite Weinstein 13 years ago. “But,” she added, a New Yorker essay “has me meditative too, of course.”

Waxman, owner of a party news site a Wrap, has publicly criticized a Times for not edition a information she collected on Weinstein in 2004. The information enclosed a comment of one Weinstein accuser, who would not concede her name to seem in print, and claims by on-the-record sources that one of Weinstein’s tip executives knew zero about film and was responsible, instead, for environment adult his trainer with women.

Waxman has reported that Weinstein and Boies met with tip editors during a Times in 2004, maybe to vigour a paper to spike her story. Bill Keller, a Times’s executive editor during a time, has pronounced he does not remember such a assembly and shielded a preference not to tell Waxman’s commentary as a outcome of Waxman’s inability spike down sufficient justification opposite Weinstein.

Keller reiterated his position to me Tuesday.

“It was 13 years ago, and my memory is hazy,” he said. “As I’ve told Sharon, Weinstein was a visit complainer. On during slightest one occasion, he showed adult with David Boies to vent. we don’t remember a topic.”

“I don’t have any correlation of Sharon’s piece, though by her possess comment of it, she didn’t have a goods,” Keller added. “I conclude that she’s broke to be scooped years after by a New York Times and New Yorker, though we don’t trust Weinstein sabotaged her piece.”

I asked Boies directly either he hired investigators to block a Times in 2004, as he did this year. He did not respond.

Particularly alarming, from a Times’s perspective, is that Boies — a distinguished warn best famous for representing Al Gore during a presidential-election relate of 2000 — worked to criticise a paper’s new stating on Weinstein while he was on a Times’s payroll, providing warn on separate matters.

“We cruise this frightful conduct, a grave profanation of trust, and a crack of a simple veteran standards that all lawyers are compulsory to observe,” a Times said in a statement.

Speaking to Farrow for a New Yorker piece, Boies pronounced he did not see a dispute of seductiveness between his work for Weinstein and his work for a Times.

“If justification could be unclosed to remonstrate the Times the charges should not be published, we did not believe, and do not believe, that that would be antithetic to the Times’s interest,” Boies said.

Yet a strategy employed by Black Cube and PSOPS, a companies engaged by Boies’s law firm, went over required pushback opposite reporters’ conclusions.

Farrow reported that in a months before announcement of Kantor and Twohey’s essay in a Times, a woman using aliases alternately acted as a Weinstein prosecution and a women’s-rights disciple in interactions with reporters from several news outlets, including Kantor.

The woman’s goal was to remove information about what a reporters knew and to news behind to Weinstein’s team.

The same lady also hidden herself into a life of a genuine Weinstein accuser, singer Rose McGowan, befriending McGowan with a aim of training what a former “Charmed” star was revelation reporters and formulation to write in a stirring book.

I asked Waxman either she had any contacts with sources in 2004 that appeared harmless during a time though now seem suspicious, in retrospect.

“No, not that we recall,” she said.

In addition, investigators operative on Weinstein’s interest probed journalists’ backgrounds in hunt of mud that could be used to disprove them. And, of course, a investigators sought compromising information about a women who purported nuisance and attack by Weinstein, to keep a women quiet.

Waxman could not find women peaceful to go on a record in 2004. Farrow’s new news on Weinstein’s termination techniques competence assistance explain why, though even Waxman can’t contend for certain.


Do you have an unusual story to tell? E-mail stories@tutuz.com