Late final week, a blogger with a unequivocally clever lane record leaked a slew of details surrounding Samsung’s arriving Galaxy Note 8. According to a report, Samsung’s hotly expected new flagship phablet will underline killers specs highlighted by a 6.3-inch Super AMOLED arrangement with a same 18.5:9 aspect ratio as a Galaxy S8, 6GB of RAM, Exynos 8895 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipsets depending on region, dual 12-megapixel back cameras, a 3,300 mAh battery, and an updated S Pen stylus with new features. All of that sounds like superb news, yet there was one other fact offering in a news that isn’t unequivocally good news: The Galaxy Note 8’s price.
According to the report — which, again, comes from a source in a position to know — a Galaxy Note 8 will launch with a €999 cost indicate in Europe. In other words, after taxes a Note 8 will sell for some-more than €1,000. In a United States, a trickle suggests a expected cost tab of “a small over $900,” that would put a cost of a Galaxy Note 8 during only underneath $1,000 after taxes.
Welcome to a epoch of a $1,000 smartphone.
Apple has been famous as a trendsetter for decades, yet a association appears to have started a discouraging trend final year when it increasing a cost of any iPhone 7 Plus tier by $20. Samsung’s Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8 Plus would be a subsequent phones to launch with heftier than normal cost tags, and mixed rumors have suggested that a arriving iPhone 8 will cost around $1,000 when it’s expelled after this year. Now, it appears as yet a Galaxy Note 8 can be combined to a flourishing list of stream and flagship phones with grievous cost tags.
Pricing always increases for all over time, so because is it so discouraging that heading flagship phones are removing some-more expensive? Let’s cruise a dual companies now pulling adult smartphone prices.
Apple is a many essential association in a world, and it’s also a many essential consumer wiring association in history. That record-shattering profitability is interjection roughly wholly to a company’s iPhone lineup, that provides margins that are equivocal obscene. Meanwhile, Samsung posted a net distinction of $6.8 billion in a many new quarter, and that was even before a company’s new Galaxy S8 flagship phones were released. Do these companies unequivocally need to fleece business even some-more than they’re already being fleeced?
The problem, of course, is that a direct is there. Plenty of other smartphone makers are offered allied phones during most reduce prices, yet not many people in tier 1 smartphone markets seem to care. In a US, for example, those insanely costly smartphones are paid for in monthly installments so a cost tags are distant reduction daunting. Worst of all, sky-high sales numbers notwithstanding a new cost increases meant we can expected design this discouraging trend to continue for a foreseeable future.
Do you have an unusual story to tell? E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org