Oscars: How an Accountant’s Tweet Turned into a Biggest Mistake in Academy History

Chaos erupted both onstage and behind a scenes after a starstruck accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers handed Warren Beatty a wrong pouch for best picture.

Oscar night’s best design failure — in that a tip endowment was mistakingly given to La La Land before it was taken behind and handed to a tangible victor, Moonlight — continues to be a car mutilate that keeps replaying in delayed motion. And as it does, some-more sum are rising about how a rare gaffe influenced those during a core of a pile-up.


Having usually felt a exhilaration of being called to a theatre as a best design winner, La La Land producer Fred Berger sensed something was wrong. Standing alongside his fellow producers Jordan Horowitz and Marc Platt, he looked out from a theatre and saw a crewmember subsequent to a timer time fluttering his arms frantically and furiously jolt his conduct no.

Then Berger listened someone circuitously yell, “it’s wrong! Moonlight won!” At first, he wondered if an interloper, a protester of some kind, had wandered onstage. But afterwards theatre manager Gary Natoli himself rushed onstage, carrying a red pouch of his own, display it to Berger and Horowitz as Platt gave his acceptance speech. At that moment, Berger and Horowitz satisfied La La Land hadn’t won — Moonlight had. In a audience, several Lionsgate executives were hugging any other and jumping adult and down when one of their colleagues spoken ominously: “Something is wrong with a card.”

Platt, who was unknowingly of what had happened, wrapped adult and pushed Berger to give his acceptance speech. At initial Berger pronounced no. “But we thought, ‘I unequivocally wish to appreciate my mother and my family,’” he told THR later that night. So he did. And afterwards he finished his debate by saying: “We lost, by a way.” Horowitz rushed in and pronounced “There’s a mistake — Moonlight, we won best picture.”

It was a biggest fumble in Oscar history, with many in a media primarily blaming presenters Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway. But several hours after a event, PricewaterhouseCoopers, a accounting organisation that tabulates and hands out a results, took shortcoming for a mistake and issued an apology to all involved. 

The disharmony that ensued was all given Beatty had been handed a wrong pouch — he was given a additional duplicate of Emma Stone’s best singer label — by Brian Cullinan, authority of a U.S. house of PwC. Sharing Academy Award duties with co-worker Martha Ruiz, Cullinan is famous for being smitten with Hollywood and tweeted a print of Stone backstage after her win, usually mins before he handed a wrong pouch to Beatty. The usually dual people who know a formula brazen of time are a dual accountants from PwC, who any have a full set of envelopes and mount in conflicting wings of a museum given they don’t know from that side a presenters will enter.

No one has nonetheless offering an reason since a PwC accountants didn’t immediately scold a mistake, generally when Beatty was clearly confused and paused before display a label to Dunaway, who announced, “La La Land!” It took dual mins and 25 seconds from when Dunaway said a name of a film to when Horowitz pronounced Moonlight was a genuine winner, an perpetuity underneath such circumstances.

“There was unequivocally a check before they told theatre manager Gary Natoli,” says a source. Natoli in spin sensitive a show’s producers, Michael De Luca and Jennifer Todd, who were backstage examination a monitors and executive Glenn Weiss. Natoli rushed onstage and sensitive a La La Land team what was happening. Host Jimmy Kimmel, who was seated in a assembly given he was formulation to hang adult a uncover with a bit with frenemy Matt Damon, saw that something was wrong and rushed onstage as well.

There were presumably other hitches that competence have set a theatre for a disaster. Sources contend there was an perplexing set change designed that would have given Beatty and Dunaway a some-more thespian entrance, though it was scrapped during a final minute. There’s a possibility that also threw off a upsurge of a eventuality and maybe contributed to a chaos.

With a dirt now settling, a doubt becomes who will take a tumble for a biggest flub in Oscar history? The Academy routinely has an awards cabinet reason a uncover postmortem within one month of a annual broadcast, and a cabinet afterwards takes a research to a Academy board, that will reason a subsequent assembly Mar 28. But sources contend there was an assembly right after a show, and that Academy boss Cheryl Boone Isaacs and CEO Dawn Hudson were livid when reps for PwC didn’t immediately take shortcoming for a error, attempted to advise it was Beatty’s blunder and primarily resisted putting out any kind of statement. 

PwC, that has overseen a Academy’s ballot-counting routine for 83 years, released a matter of reparation 3 hours later. PwC followed adult with a second apology, that it described as a “revised statement,” Monday evening. Saying it took “full responsibility for a array of mistakes and breaches of determined protocols,” it singled out Cullinan for his tweeting during a eventuality and for handing Beatty a wrong envelope.”

The Academy subsequently released an reparation of a possess — to Beatty, Dunaway, a filmmakers and fans. Noting that PwC had taken full responsibility, a Academy pronounced it has begun an investigation into a resources surrounding a occurrence and that it “will establish what actions are suitable relocating forward.”

Some trust a Academy should disjoin ties with a accounting group for destiny awards shows, notwithstanding their long-standing relationship. But sources contend a Academy could find it unequivocally formidable to sinecure a new accounting association given of a difficult complement used for voting tabulation as good as a fact that PwC handles other accounting chores for a Academy.

Lawyers surveyed don’t design a Oscars flub to outcome in lawsuit by a Academy opposite PwC, nonetheless if a Academy wanted to get aggressive, it could try to disagree that PricewaterhouseCoopers breached a avocation of care.

“The agreement could have spelled out a duties of PricewaterhouseCoopers including an requirement to benefaction a right results,” says Devin McRae, a litigator during Early Sullivan. “They’ve been doing this so long, they competence have grown a agreement that’s unequivocally detailed. The Academy competence try to get a cost break, revelation PWC, ‘You have to take a hit. This is a misfortune probable blunder we can make.’”

Under this scenario, a brawl would usually strike a justice if a parties couldn’t determine on financial remuneration for a ostensible negligence. If a Academy did sue, McRae says it would be challenged to uncover damages. The box would expected also try what was a present means for a flub.

Eriq Gardner contributed to this report.


Do you have an unusual story to tell? E-mail stories@tutuz.com