Plant-eating dinosaurs might have dined on molluscs on special occasions, investigate says

Think dinosaurs didn’t brew things adult during mealtime? Think again. Researchers investigate fossilized dinosaur feces from about 75 million years ago have detected that during slightest some plant-eating dinosaurs also snacked on shellfish.


The find of crustacean stays in a droppings, described in Scientific Reports, reveals that vast herbivorous dinosaurs such as hadrosaurs competence have had distant some-more formidable eating habits than we customarily give them credit for.

“We need to labour a reckless about dinosaur diets,” pronounced lead author Karen Chin, a paleontologist during a University of Colorado in Boulder.

Scientists investigate a creatures of a mislaid world, eventually annihilated by an asteroid some 66 million years ago, typically demeanour during a skeleton these animals left behind. But yet skeleton exhibit most about an animal’s shape, they exhibit customarily so most about how an animal indeed interacted with a sourroundings — for example, how it fit into a ecosystem’s formidable food web.

That’s since a dinosaur’s poo is a paleontologist’s changed stone. In a singular eventuality that it happens to be deposited in a right environmental conditions to turn a hoary (at that indicate it’s called a coprolite), it can exhibit most about what a dinosaur was indeed eating.

“Direct justification for diet in a hoary record is unequivocally rare,” Chin said. “We are customarily forced to rest simply on a bones, so we investigate a teeth and a jaw and other aspects of organic morphology. So when we find coprolites like these … they do yield a opposite viewpoint on a diet.”

These sold coprolites were detected in southern Utah during a Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument’s Kaiparowits Formation. They were dim — a pointer that they had been filled with rotting timber — and were noted by backfilled dung-beetle tunnels.

The researchers could tell that a timber had been rotting before a animals ate it since it was so fragmented. This meant that a tough polymer in a dungeon walls called lignin had been damaged down. Animals have a tough time eating uninformed timber since they can’t scrupulously digest lignin — though fungi can, that allows animals to afterwards entrance a wood’s formidable sugars. That lignin-breakdown by fungi can customarily occur in a participation of oxygen — that means it couldn’t have happened inside a oxygen-poor sourroundings of an animal’s gut.

Though it competence seem uncanny that a plant-eater would eat rotting tree bits, it’s not totally out of a question, Chin said. Cattle in Chile are famous to eat rotting logs on occasion, substantially for a same reason. Similar wood-filled dinosaur dung had been found in Montana, too, about 1,000 miles or so divided from a Utah site.

The unequivocally bizarre member of a dung was this: fragments of what seemed to be crustacean bombard in 10 of a 15 specimens they studied. They’re not certain accurately what class these molluscs competence be, though a bombard comes in tubular shapes suggestive of appendages and flat, thin-layered structures that would have done adult crustaceans’ cuticle, their tough outdoor layer.

One citation full of crustacean pieces could have been a fluke, though Chin and her colleagues found a shell-filled dung over 3 opposite levels of rock, that implies that this eating function persisted over time, maybe unequivocally prolonged durations of time.

The scientists contend a plant-eating dinosaurs were substantially hadrosaurs, vast duck-billed dinosaurs that ate plants and thrived in a area. And with rows of teeth housed in their mouths, they would have been one of a few of their plant-eating peers that could munch by timber and even cuticle, too.

Why would these animals eat crustaceans? Chin’s supposition is this: Herbivores can’t rest on rotting timber year-round, since there wouldn’t be adequate of it to go around. The rotting timber was substantially an occasional meal. And she wondered either a molluscs competence have been eaten along with a rotting timber during tact season, when they’d need all a additional calcium and protein they could get to lay their eggs.

This suspicion competence have a together in a function of some birds, that are dinosaurs’ customarily vital descendants: Chin forked out that some seed-eating birds demeanour for insects when it comes time to lay eggs, substantially seeking out a additional proteins and minerals.

If that’s a box for these dinosaurs, afterwards their eating habits competence have been distant some-more formidable than formerly thought, Chin said.

The commentary came as something of a surprise, pronounced Jordan Mallon, a paleontologist during a Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa who was not concerned in a paper.

“Duck-billed dinosaurs are a organisation that we’ve famous about for a prolonged time, good over 100 years, and we suspicion we had them figured out and we suspicion we had them pinned as these despotic herbivores,” Mallon said. “So to find that in fact their feces spasmodic enclose these crustacean cuticles kind of held us off-guard.”

Of course, it’s scarcely unfit to discern a animals’ intentions. Were a molluscs eaten by collision or by choice?

Chin points out that a shelled animals were substantially during slightest 5 centimeters, large adequate that a hadrosaur would have beheld and could have apart it out if it wanted, a approach that ducks apart out pieces of food they’ve motionless aren’t value eating.

Mallon pronounced he didn’t consider a dinosaurs were intentionally eating a crustaceans; in all likelihood, a molluscs were an unintended serve to a meal.

Plenty of sea animals currently finish adult with all kinds of cosmetic or other synthetic waste in their guts, Mallon forked out — rabble that offering no nutritive value and should have been avoided.

“Yes, animals can be selective, though we don’t have to demeanour unequivocally prolonged to find counter-examples in a universe today,” he said.

And a fact that both bombard and timber were found in a same droppings does not indispensably meant they were partial of a same entrée, Mallon said. They could have been eaten during apart times, though both are tough materials that take time to digest and so competence have finished adult creation their exit together.

Regardless, he added, a commentary prominence how critical it is to continue digging into dinosaur droppings.

“I consider what she’s been display is that these fossilized blobs of poo are value looking during a small further,” Mallon pronounced of Chin and her work. “I consider it’s display that there’s some engaging things to be found in there; that we bear to learn a lot from looking during them.”

amina.khan@latimes.com

Follow @aminawrite on Twitter for some-more scholarship news and “like” Los Angeles Times Science Health on Facebook.


Do you have an unusual story to tell? E-mail stories@tutuz.com