The FTC filed a blockbuster lawsuit opposite Qualcomm today, arguing that a chipmaker used a baseband processor patents to illegally force competitors out of a market. (The brief version: a FTC says Qualcomm wouldn’t sell modems to any association that didn’t also determine to compensate Qualcomm obvious royalties on phones that used modems from other supplies, that a group refers to a a “no-license-no-chips” policy.)
Anyway, a large partial of a censure has to do with Apple, and a fact that Qualcomm spent a lot of time operative and compliance a understanding with Cupertino to sojourn a disdainful provider of modems in a iPhone. Among a moves it made? The FTC says that in 2007, Qualcomm concluded to reinstate some of Apple’s obvious kingship payments if Apple concluded not to make a WiMAX iPhone.
Here’s a FTC’s complaint:
Under a 2007 agreement, Qualcomm concluded to remission to Apple royalties that Qualcomm perceived from Apple’s agreement manufacturers in additional of a specified per-handset cap. Qualcomm’s remuneration obligations were conditioned upon, among other things, Apple not offered or chartering a handset implementing a WiMax standard, a impending fourth-generation mobile customary championed by Intel and against by Qualcomm.
WiMAX is passed now, though in 2007, this was a Big Deal: Sprint had only done an huge gamble on violence a marketplace to 4G speeds by deploying a WiMAX network in 2008, forward of LTE, and Intel still had an event to make a symbol in mobile. Paying off Apple authorised Qualcomm to keep a iPhone off a faster network until LTE was prepared — and in a routine effectively kneecapped Sprint, that invested billions into a network that couldn’t support a destiny iPhone roadmap.
Ten years later, and Sprint has switched to LTE though still isn’t in good figure — T-Mobile CEO John Legere only referred to Sprint as “exploding” and hinted that he competence like to take it over. Intel’s not doing most improved when it comes to mobile, nonetheless a association only managed to get some modems in a iPhone 7. But it’s engaging to consider about what competence have been if a initial 4G iPhone had been a WiMAX indication on Sprint, while each other network was still using 3G.
Do you have an unusual story to tell? E-mail email@example.com